Item Database

Nano Crystal (Anvil Fists)

Nano Crystal - Melee-based damage inflicted by the caster is increased by 106 points.

FlagsVisible, Tell Collision, Has Energy, No Drop
Patch17060000
QL215

Requirements

HookAttributeOperatorValue
To Use Sensory improvement at least 1843
To Use Biological metamorphosis at least 1843
To Use Profession exactly Martial artist
To Use Cyberdeck unknown 64

Effects

HookTargetActionAttributeValue
On Use User Upload Nano 270798

Comments

24 archived

Discuss this nano on the forum

Xira 2007-10-17 19:09
48 more damage never hurts
Dollcet 2007-10-27 20:28
For the nanoskills required this is a bad joke and it benefits only Fire Dmg , should have made a boost to all dmg-types or simply add some MA-skill via something like "improved 4 fist of kali" . Either FC is smoking some bad stuff or they just dont care at all what MA�s want.
paraing 2007-10-31 01:31
well the baddest joke wonder if they think its green stats we have on that ?
Xyphos 2007-11-06 03:19
User Cyberdeck & 6
WTF? MA's don't have Cyberdecks...
FC *WAS* smoking some bad shit...
Worldnuker 2007-11-06 19:29
Level to 220 and try it instead of whining like twats? Im sure FC would test it before they put it on, they arent ****ing stupid, they made the game ffs
Joxer 2007-11-10 22:40
why would they bother adding ALL damage types to a nano that changes your damage type to FIRE, only reason they have melee damage on it is because brawl is melee dmg and it doesn't change type
Worldnuker 2007-11-12 00:39
Xyphos try reading the other nanos. It doesnt mean wear cyberdeck its a bug, its odvious, seriously you thought it was genuine? Its a description bug.
Ebag333 2007-11-12 09:51
Actually, it's not. :)
All professions will have their own cyberdeck, that allows them to use 4 new nanos. The cyberdeck will take up a HUD/Util slot (not a weapon slot).
Worldnuker 2007-11-14 15:47
Ooh...Can you hotswap it out? Or do you have to wear it for the duration of the nano? Eg, can you put it on, buff, take it off?
Xyphos 2007-11-15 00:45
ok, so has anyone found this yet? where?
Worldnuker 2007-11-25 21:32
Its coming in a future patch i think, noone seems to have the new decks yet
dougflutie 2007-12-18 08:15
we got the decks. this nano didn't make the cuts. we got the melee one instead it seems.
@ Worldnuker
yes you can hotswap it, no you don't need it for the duration of the nano, but yes you need it on to cast them.
Worldnuker 2007-12-30 00:38
Melee? It better make a fiery effect or i will be pissed off, thats why MAs are sexy, like a stone colored flame lol
KDawg 2008-01-06 19:17
Would be nice if it actually overrode damage type to melee.
Oh, and if it was actually self castable without swapping on a set of arithmetic.
0000 2008-01-21 19:38
WTB knowing how much a decent 220 ma with maxed research would have for BM/SI.
Salamande 2008-01-28 00:06
1786 BM / 1829 SI self.
Razvann 2008-02-01 11:54
This nano is quite good and i tell you why i was using fire fist buff like every nub ma but i started think for a second all perks are melee so if you wanna do pvp you gotta use melee it will rape a cocoon in a few seconds so very good against engi enfo adventurer keeper and so on who use coon but this is imposible to cast unless you wanna be a useless gimp .So i stay on melee from now on.
Vgman 2008-02-14 04:39
exacly but your ma attacks (blessed with thunder/upon a wave of sumerr ect) have a higher chance of actually hitting in pvp, i dont normaly hit people with perks in tl5 bs so i normaly go energy fists cause it stacks with thunders dmg.
Vgman 2008-02-15 16:31
one more thing... would love to see a crit chance buff on this line :P
Xenon 2008-04-20 13:35
Would be nice if they added "User Change Damage type Melee AC" to it for some pvm epeen. :P
Aurielle 2008-07-07 02:08
Not just pvm either, would override dmg type on your bow for pvp. Ridiculous nanoskills to cast this, total waste of db space.
legionofone 2008-10-07 10:53
Trash without lower requirements and dmg override
lonewolf2k7 2008-10-08 15:18
FC are stupid roflmao
taipan 2010-10-17 11:14
wtf they are thinking?