Item Database
Lick of the Pest
Covers the target with reactive chemicals, lowering the chemical AC by 5000 points.
| Flags | Default Target, Item Texture Override, Buff Nano |
|---|---|
| Patch | 110000 |
| QL | 193 |
| Crystal | NanoCrystal (Lick of the Pest) |
| NCU | 46 |
| Nanocost | 825 |
| School | Protection — Protection |
| Duration | 1 minute, 7 seconds |
| Attack time | 11.00s |
| Recharge time | 3.50s |
| Range | 30.00 m |
| Effect icon | |
| Stacking order | 46 |
Attack skills
| Skill | % |
|---|---|
| Matter metamorphosis | 33% |
| Biological metamorphosis | 33% |
| Matter creation | 34% |
Defense skills
| Skill | % |
|---|---|
| Nano resist | 110% |
Requirements
| Hook | Attribute | Operator | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| To Use | Profession | exactly | Nano-technician |
| To Use | Level | at least | 185 |
| To Use | Matter creation | at least | 1026 |
| To Use | Biological metamorphosis | at least | 1026 |
| To Use | Matter metamorphosis | at least | 1026 |
Effects
| Hook | Target | Action | Attribute | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On Use | Target | Modify | Chemical AC | -5000 |
AC Typedmg has nothing to do with nukes damage unfortunately.
sorry but this is wrong. AC does indeed effect nuke dmg. try nuking any RK mob, and then nuke a heck, you'll see what i mean :P
in conclsion - use this nano+ checmical damage nanos. too bad RB uses radiation :(
i think that every 10 points of any given AC will provide a subtraction of 1 point of damage of the AC type.
okay, thats not what im posting about tho.
im figuring that once the chemical AC is lowered to 0, then the damage is unaffected by the AC at all. BUT: i wonder if ACs can be lowered to negative points? also, along with that; what would happen if i were to nuke a target with this nano running, lowering their AC to negative, will the nuke do extra damage?
its just something that came to mind.
As to rk mobs and sl mobs, there really isnt a compairison, sl mobs usualy have x3 the ac's and NR and dmg and hp check to most rk mobs. and yur min dmg in sl all the time, as to the people that allways say, chemical dmg on hecklers, this is a myth.. yes they seem to be more prone, but if your AR is high enough it doesn't matter what dmg you deal, if your weapon is fire, chem, cold dmg whatever.. if your ar is great enough you will match min dmg on your weapon to the mob ( hecklers as some seem to point out, is funny, why do you think you never hardly see MA's tanking hecklers, because at that lvl ( mid 150-190 usualy a weapon class can get greater AR)...In conclusion, it's pretty clear ask your self if you can't land a nuke it get's reissted.. ac's don't resist nano resistance does, Yes if it lands and you can spam chem dmg after, you may see a slight change but considering how old the nano is and going full deff, with 11 seconds..hehe, doing mass dmg is nice, but guess who goes straight to the top of a hate list. :P
Yes you can drain ACs to negative (at least in PvP, been drained by agents in TL5 pvp)..
U do have to take into acount specific +dmg items when doing this. (aruls)
you don't hit for min dmg all the time just b/c your in the Shadowlands, its because a lot of the mobs in sl have 3x or more the AC you will find on mobs in rk...... just like you said.
As for your argument about AR, first of all its ridiculous, you are saying just get a ton of AR and you're fine(duh). Getting the most out of what you have (skillz ;) is what wins fights. Knowing your enemy's weaknesses or creating a weakness and using it against them, that is what this nano is all about. Also AR has vry little to do with choosing a tank, again skill is ftw, combined with a good taunt toolset + max health ofc.
I need to know who this froob NT is. Would be interested to meet him. Don't think you can achieve 1026 to BM MM and MC all by yourself.
Proof:
http://auno.org/ao/equip.php?saveid=194074
This setup squeezes out as many points in MC,BM and MM as possible. No weapon equipped here because the NT is using a chem rifle (doesn't add nanoskill points).
With trickledowns, this setup and self buffed, I'm only calculating 895 MM, 936 BM, 1045 MC. I'm still 100+ points short here. I.e. to say, that NT probably had mochams running. Naughty outside buffer ;)